InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

DeerBalls

11/01/19 12:59 AM

#86820 RE: Smokinfattys #86818

WRONG: That is what the $355k is, SO THEY AREN'T "PAID FOR" AND REMAIN FROZEN! I see nothing of the shares being unfrozen, given back, awarded, addressed, nor anything of the sort in the judgement. NOBODY DOES, BECAUSE IT ISN'T THERE! missy has no shares, PERIOD!

THE SHARES WERE FROZEN YEARS AGO!!!!

FURTHER MORE, SAY THE $90k GOES AGAINST SHAREHOLDERS, I DON'T BELIEVE IT, BUT $90k FOR 124mm SHARES....SOLD DOING THE "HAPPY DANCE" AND ECSTATIC!


IF THE SHARES WERE NEVER FROZEN AND IN THE POSSESSION OF missy, WHY WAS SHE SUING FOR THEM????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????

SUING FOR SOMETHING SHE ALREADY HAD???
icon url

Plowmaster

11/01/19 1:10 AM

#86824 RE: Smokinfattys #86818

Thank you for the facts.

Still would be sure they update that ASOS

They going to need to raise the AS though for when Emil starts suing the entire weed industry!!!

Hahaha so funny Emil knows this fraud scam has run its course, just like when Avatar blew up in his face. Now he is already seeding his next troll lawsuits lololol

What a freaking piece of shit fraud
icon url

nyt

11/01/19 1:25 AM

#86828 RE: Smokinfattys #86818

Actually, I believe they WERE taken, that is if sawyer is to be believed. As far as I know, he's the only one that ever said the shares were taken, actually on multiple occasions over a couple years time, from before 2012 & up to 2013 or so. He stated the internal audi revealed this. Either he would've signed off on it, or Chang, depending on who was ceo at the time, I would think. If there were no shares ever taken, it would be some more pretty serious fraud that vplm has said they were for all these years, so I'm pretty sure the shares WERE taken. As far as frozen, that remains to be seen. I would assume they were and if so, I would thing legally, vplm now will be forced to unfreeze them, since they are the ones found guilty of two counts of being very bad and locksmith not only was not found guilty of anything, but the vplm case against them was DISMISSED. Those facts considered, seems obvious that the shares belong to locksmith and they will have to be unfrozen. That's just my opinion as I'm not a lawyer but it makes common sense, unless there is still some heretofore unrevealed info to come out. Not only was Voip-Pal.Com, Inc SPECIFICALLY found guilty & has to pay the fine established for them, plus interest, but I anticipate there will be more of the jusgement to come out that will say vplm is also liable for court costs. The court costs in the other, dismissed case, were ordered to be paid by both sides as their own expense, per the agreement.