What would make sense is if the officers at the time period hat those filings involved had signed off on them themselves. It’s not like the officers are not around. Obviously Liz has been plenty active on the phone with shareholders. Why isn’t her name on them? Instead you have a SEC litigated individual who has a permanent Bar against him from dealing with pennystocks. Not sure why some don’t see the problem with that. Perhaps Tony thought he could fly under the SEC radar by using an alias on the filings.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
