sure, possible and sensible as suitor would want to have that as well
when I played with the numbers, 50% on net sales (less rebates),
is A LOT to be honest.
reason why I added the 30% on sales case, knowing that ~22.6% means 50% of profits on average pharma costs/margins.
so as a heads up: If NP gets a deal done for >= 20% on net sales, it is already awesome - just that people understand the numbers.
From this number on, the pharma is willing to earn less than the IP owner CYDY.
How could a pharma offer such a high percentage of the whole cake, i.e. 50% on sales -> 70%+ on profits? It must be a really high margin, low production costs and sort of no advertising required.
IMHO a BP not a small one - at least a very experienced one knowing their numbers pretty well.
Just a little debate on the details ..
EDITED: Or .. they get a bigger cake for another country. Also possible (o8>