Replies to post #22695 on Mosaic ImmunoEngineering Inc (CPMV)

[Elmetritschle]

then we are already a hurdle, right?

[papadedavid]

Very nice raider...thanks again for your job. Nobody can say the company is using all this to pump the stock...you have to wonder why...VOLUME COMING IMHO.

[papadedavid]

Over the last several terms, petitioners were successful in
winning a full hearing about six percent of the time.2 In fact, even though
it only takes one Justice to put a case on the conference agenda, threequarters of the requests for review are rejected without discussion.

https://scholarship.law.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2115&context=lawreview

[papadedavid]

Question: What does it mean to relist a case?

Answer: When a case is relisted, that means the justices do not grant or deny review, but instead will reconsider the case at their next conference. This will be reflected on the case’s electronic docket once the docket has been updated: You will see the words “DISTRIBUTED for Conference of [fill in date],” and then the next entry in the docket will usually say “DISTRIBUTED for Conference of [next conference after the previous entry, whenever that is].” It is almost impossible to know exactly what is happening when a particular case is relisted, but a few different things could be going on. One justice could be trying to pick up a fourth vote to grant review, one or more justices just want to look more closely at the case, a justice could be writing an opinion about the court’s decision to deny review, or the court could be writing an opinion to summarily (that is, without briefing or oral argument on merits) reverse the decision below. In 2014, the court appears to have adopted a general practice of granting review only after it has relisted a case at least once; although we don’t know for sure, presumably the court uses the extra time resulting from a relist to make sure that the case is a suitable one for its review.

https://www.scotusblog.com/2018/06/faqs-announcements-of-orders-and-opinions-2/