I've tried to come at this from a "value-saving" philosophy, ie, what is in the best interests of longs to preserve value by not becoming overly reactionary to the company's shortcomings regards investor relations, of which obviously there are many. And in doing this I've reached a strong disagreement with those who want to aggressively demand explanations from the company in such a way that the company reacts by becoming even more defensive and basically hides behind its lawyers and accountants. And in this overall process I've determined that this demanding group of holders is barely, if at all, discernible from those who bash the company.
But as I said, at this point I feel that too much energy has been wasted trying to justify a position when in fact the vast majority of posters only listen to what they want to hear. So ... if I misinterpreted your ultimate motive to preserve shareholder value, again, I don't agree with how you've approached it, but I apologize for my mischaracterization of you.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
