InvestorsHub Logo

lorbas95

10/14/19 9:09 AM

#47087 RE: d0lphint0m #47086

I'm not calling for Nader to be replaced. But if he can't get BLA submitted and a deal done by year-end or beginning of next year, I doubt that he will have much support left (at least that's my impression from public and private exchanges on both boards).

With GvHD, they have postponed a very low-hanging fruit last year to advance cancer. Well, TNBC interim results still far away. True, this might have been mostly on the lame duck Pestell (though this remains to be seen in the course of the lawsuit), but seriously: after several weeks/months delay with no first patient injection, it should have occured to Nader and the BOD to check on what their CMO is (not) doing much sooner... IMO.

I'm not really happy with the strategic performance of the company recently either: e.g. Mulholland's offer to 'loyal shareholders' tanked the SP. And btw, what about the prognostic test that was our best shot for non-dilutive financing as we were told (I have to assume it's a dead end).

Stability data delay is on the company. They should have prepared data for all doses.

And if a 3rd line cancer drug like Copiktra can get $15m up-front for Japan, it can't be impossible to win an interested party there for licensing leronlimab for $25-30m.

Still hoping for that 90m deal coming to fruition soon.

weasel6667

10/14/19 9:28 AM

#47089 RE: d0lphint0m #47086

In my opinion a seasoned CEO would not have sailed into the shallow financial waters like Nader did. This is the worst negotiation position you can have (high pressure to finish a deal) and Nader has full responsibility for this trap. If we have no deal by end of this week, we can assume his "inflate the potential/ theoretical value of the company by all means" strategy failed big time. Greed kills.

My understanding is, Nader sailed into shallow waters without having a plan B because he was irresponsibly believing his own stories (carrots) he told the shareholders. Or maybe Paulson was his plan B but this dried up way too early for Nader.

Grip it and Sip It

10/14/19 9:36 AM

#47092 RE: d0lphint0m #47086

A different CEO would have substantial negotiating experience. He/she would also live in a reality of FMV.... to which Nader has neither.

He’s done an admiral job but has out-kicked his coverage. Time to bring in an experienced head coach!

He’ll still parachute out a rich man

Grip