Those deals were all part of 1 Reg A. These were not separate situations. If the Reg A was fully funded, all of those deals would've materialized. It was 1 singular situation. It was an all-or-none situation.
Do I think the CEO could've promoted better to get that original Reg A fully funded within the SEC's allotted time frame? Yes, I do. But I feel that he learned from his mistakes with that first Reg A, and is going to get things right this second time.
Everyone deserves a second chance. I feel that this CEO will surprise many people and succeed bigly.