InvestorsHub Logo
Boards
News
Market Data
Markets
Discover
Discover
AI Subscribe Login/Register account icon
S&P 500
0.00
(
0.00%
)
US TECH 100
19,494.80
(
0.28%
)
Dow Jones
41,794.60
(
0.00%
)
Brent Oil
75.46
(
0.45%
)
Bitcoin
68,786.41
(
1.43%
)

Replies to post #568759 on Fannie Mae-No Politics (FNMA)

Replies to #568759 on Fannie Mae-No Politics (FNMA)
icon url

401kobessive

10/07/19 5:09 PM

#568763 RE: cclose1 #568759

I think the real fear is that the Federal Reserve has the same structure.
so if the others are unconsistutional...so is the Fed.

Big problems for everyone that likes debt laden money, instead of a currency backed by...something valuable.
icon url

Clutch29

10/07/19 5:17 PM

#568766 RE: cclose1 #568759

(They someone DOES NOT WANT SCOTUS to hear the Collins case, thus dropping CFPB so there is not split circuitsAre you meaning split by fed and state?. Something is getting teed up)

They being (government)? No split circuit? (Teed up) , what might you speculate.?
That is the only part I dont understand, but thanks for the layman's with how it all went down.
icon url

YanksGhost

10/07/19 5:31 PM

#568769 RE: cclose1 #568759

Is there a link for this? In transcription, are you sure the statement was not "... and the House should NOT be allowed to do so as an amicus"?

I fail to see how this walk back on Director Discharge means "someone DOES NOT WANT SCOTUS to hear the Collins case..." The key issue to be decided on Friday for SCOTUS is vacatur, not discharge of the Director. That was already resolved in the en banc ruling.