InvestorsHub Logo

drobx

10/06/19 5:23 PM

#22641 RE: Neverending #22640

If the court wants to address this issue then this might actually be a very good case because the plaintiffs (if that is the right word here) are represented by a top notch law firm. Addressing the issue does not imply that they are inclined to side with the plaintiffs. They might just want to clarify the situation.

ccraider

10/07/19 6:36 AM

#22642 RE: Neverending #22640

Never, years ago you were PUBPAT (or at least in bed), if i recall correct...!?
corrections welcome...

....illegitimate patent troll companies like PTSC who hurt technological innovation...

Your wording sounds like you are still acting as a tec lobbyist, no? Aprox. 200-300 companies did consider PTSC/TPL as patent owner and ALLIACENSE as their agent to materialize the MMP portfolio and bought a licence.
Yes, PTSC C-level made a lot of mistakes in the past, anyway, i am looking forward to the outcome of the petition at SCOTUS....
May be this is the start to get ex-Judge Grewals (short after this case he joined Facebook as Principal) ruling changed sometime (at lower courts) in future.
Even if the patents are expired, there seems to be a potential 5 years periode to calculate economical the tec's patent usage and violation.
Hmmm, i am sure Ken Starr's reputation will overcome your "projection" of the clerks "knowledge"...