What's wrong is that your argument is completely flawed and contradicts your own statements. The true value is set by the market and inserting a licensee middleman into the mix doesn't change that, it just further lowers your profit.
The other flaw in your argument is that it goes against the very benefits of flow that you've stated over and over. We're told that we have the best QD's. We're told we are the low cost producer. We're told we need very little labor. We're told that we can scale up unlimitedly for very low capex. If Nanosys can make money, we should be able to make more. Is that not true? And we should be able to do that in addition to whatever else more profitable we want to do because out cost to expand is so low. Is that waong? but instead we chose to give away 10's of millions of shares? Explain that without banal platitudes.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
