Someone posts a current journal article that's way more relevant than most of the journal articles posted here, doesn't mention QDSC one way or another, and you feel the need to jump on him and tell him to do more research? You get mad at me for calling out falsities favorable to QMC then turn right around and get mad at someone posting facts? LOL. Like I've asked over and over, if QMC is even a fraction as great as some folks here claim, where does this insecurity come from?
These researchers are talking about capturing the same energy flow as QDSC would theoretically. They made it work. Has QMC demonstrated QDSC at night yet?
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
