InvestorsHub Logo

YearOfTheWorm

09/25/19 8:02 PM

#93987 RE: uvaphd #93985

Uvaphd, that is up to the scientific/medical folks at Springer to decide. We can only conjecture.
Myself, not being a urologist, or doctor, and not seeing the actual results, want to believe the story, despite seriously nasty share issues. Is the science and medicine solid enough to pass muster? We will find out soon hopefully.

justdafactss

09/25/19 8:44 PM

#93990 RE: uvaphd #93985

Hmmm CELZ never said a journal editor screened the manuscript and decided to send it for full peer review right?

https://www.biomedcentral.com/getpublished/peer-review-process

Journal decision-making process

Typically, after a paper is submitted to a journal, a journal editor screens the manuscript and decides whether or not to send it for full peer review. Only after clearing the initial screening is the manuscript sent to one or more peer reviewers. Finally, journal editors or the journal’s editorial board consider the peer reviewers’ reports and make the final decision to accept or reject the manuscript for publication.


https://www.editage.com/insights/peer-review-process-and-editorial-decision-making-at-journals