If you have read any of the OTC documents, you perhaps did not understand them. Here are some doozies from the 6/30 report:
(In other words, Ken Bland gave himself a whole boatload of shares in exchange for at $15K loan he purportedly made in 2012.)
(In other words, this is a shell at all of the many levels.)
(So, if I understand this tortuous language, as soon as FINRA approves people holding shares here will see an implosion in the number of shares they hold by a ratio of about 1 to 60. The key question is how much of this shell current shareholders will own. Shells have value, but not a whole lot, so the fraction owned by shareholders matters. So, the next part is key.)
(So, today's current shareholders are going to end up owning only a small sliver of the resulting shell.)
(And, ooopsies, the shell is in fact a debt-ridden shell...)
(It is not clear who holds these notes or why this money was purportedly paid to WTKN/10SION. But if it is a shell now, I guess that all that is left of these loans is the obligation to pay them back. And look at the impact that just $15K of debt conversion had!)
(And from the attorney letter...)
(And as near as I can tell, the "business described" is also a shell, so this is 3 layers of shells -- all debt-ridden.)
So, can you explain what about this you find so attractive? Please don't respond with more nonsense about CBD oils and micro-refineries. Why do you find this debt-ridden shell so attractive?