InvestorsHub Logo

arachnodude

09/21/19 5:49 PM

#171810 RE: Theprofessor2 #171807

Thanks for that, Professor.

Any way you could point a brother in the direction of that information. I'd greatly appreciate it. Thanks again.

ThingsComeUndone

09/21/19 6:50 PM

#171812 RE: Theprofessor2 #171807

NDA that sounds like a buyout or could it mean something else just curious

Axolotl

09/21/19 7:04 PM

#171814 RE: Theprofessor2 #171807

How is that positive? If KBLB is some hot shot company with a ground breaking product that will revolutionize the industry why do they have to bend over backwards for some unknown designer?

They should be dictating the terms in the relationship in this case and yet they agreed to an NDA that doesn't benefit the company? Doesn't bode well if the company can't make use of its clout, doesn't have any, or doesn't care either way

TRUISM

09/21/19 8:07 PM

#171817 RE: Theprofessor2 #171807

That has been confirmed through my DD.



Catwalk I

Catwalk II








Blessings
TRUTH

faithabides

09/22/19 1:53 AM

#171841 RE: Theprofessor2 #171807

Professor is a straight shooter. But, if this is true, .. and I do believe it is then it a major ... for the very short term imo.

DimesForShares

09/23/19 8:21 AM

#171975 RE: Theprofessor2 #171807

There is a difference between DD and ‘inside sources.’

DD was finding the link between KBLB, Kings, and M. That linkage was shared and anyone could review it.

Inside sources means you have private information (which probably can’t be shared).

I’m never quite sure about what to do with private sources. I don’t know most of the posters on this board, have no idea about their sources, and wasn’t present to hear the exchange.

So I tend to place such claims in a ‘perhaps true/perhaps false’ quantum uncertainty bin. But if you really have DD, please post your sources.