InvestorsHub Logo

CatBirdSeat

09/18/19 6:36 AM

#561301 RE: 10bambam #561299

Nonsense.

YanksGhost

09/18/19 8:19 AM

#561327 RE: 10bambam #561299

<< re: partial walk-back of NWS in Agreement >>

I have pondered this extensively. I find the likelihood low because it would not serve to support the safety requirement for building capital that FHFA has hung its hat on. However, this could be a big bargaining chip in settlement talks to extract concessions from litigants to avoid years of further litigation delays and legal upfront cost of billable hours.

If you missed the Boyle Capital analysis a few days ago, I posted a link here earlier this AM.

dcpi212

09/18/19 8:46 AM

#561338 RE: 10bambam #561299

Not only may they do this,but it looks like they intend to increase the seniors preference by whatever amount they do not sweep.