Or perhaps the non-binding offer signed stated a deadline after which it must be transformed into a binding agreement, which happens to be in five weeks. Hence he said last week "They have six more weeks". So perhaps it would be prudent to wait five more weeks until calling him an idiot ;)
HA! NP has indeed firmly established a unique brand of measuring time. Even though he's unreliable and unpredictable to a fault, at these price levels if an investor has the wallet & will to take the plunge don't see how you can lose. ( I'm adding here & there)
One thing ( among many) I'll never understand is why they continued to stall the revised GVHD trial for over a year. If it's important to prove utility and versatility lets get this small trial finished and drive home the point.
As I stated many times. The proper thing to do would be to reverse stock split, uplist to NASDAQ and gain strong institutional shareholders. That's how you do it. That's what a real CEO and management team would have done. There is no reason to linger on the OTC. To do what? Keep issuing warrants increasing the float to an outrageous amount of shares? That's what needs to be done, unfortunately this CEO won't do it.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
