Yes, if nanoviricides can be made and shown to work in humans, they will re-write books to add a new form of defense against viral diseases: nanoscale cellular mimetics / cell entry inhibitors that also destroy viruses, independently of the host or host immune system. Agree that we aren't changing any fundamental understanding about the biology of viral infection - just a potential new treatment.
As I linked in my previous posts, physicists know that their theories are incomplete and therefore wrong. For instance, Schrodinger's equation predicts infinite gravitational fields in empty space. There is no way to link quantum physics and particles on the very smallest scales to gravity. Mills provides that missing link: space-time contracts when energy is converted to matter (via particle production) and space-time expands when matter is converted to energy. This is how he was able to predict the continued acceleration of the rate of expansion of the universe before it was observed. There is no need for "dark energy." Similarly, Mills explains and characterizes "dark matter" as hydrinos.
There are lots of holes in physics theories, and the final story hasn't been written yet.
It's interesting that Mills predicts a "fifth force," and wrote a patent for it here:
It will be a long while before that theory is tested - before someone runs the experiments as suggested to create a "pseudo-electron" with negative curvature in space-time. It's good to be skeptical, but always to be open to new ideas and data, "facts" and experiments and trial results even, as they come in. It's good not to be too optimistic and gullible too, so understand and think it's wise to see a little proof before investing in a "revolutionary" new technology. Wish I would have waited on NNVC until they proved safe in humans, for instance!
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
