InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

SGINPHX

09/12/19 3:44 PM

#558472 RE: pka1639 #558467

Ok...Yanks, Obit, Navy, Someone smarter than me...
1) If they say raise the buffer to 25-30B and in turn raise the owed amount the same ( odd that it would correlate to the same as the overpayment huh?!?) then we slowly build for a couple years till we hit that number, right?
2) If the amount is getting added to payoff amount...lets just take the money from treasury and have it...we will owe it later LOL
3) its great to keep the profits as we need the buffer but the added monies to payback after the En Banc is crazy! What can be done? Stay? Something?
Thanks for the help!
icon url

3antar

09/12/19 3:56 PM

#558488 RE: pka1639 #558467

This guy MC, has been told don't say anything but say something, he seems way confused, he is trying to sound like Trump, but he is confusing him self and everyone else, he says commons will continue to trade, then maybe not, sounds so much like Trump, "we may have a deal, but maybe we wouldn't have to make a deal", huh will see....

FnF and en banc are much strong then a government employee... mess with shareholders property and more suits will come
icon url

camaro4me

09/12/19 4:08 PM

#558496 RE: pka1639 #558467

Hopefully Calabria just talks about every scenario, even ones that won't occur.

After saying all classes would continue to trade, the only possible scenario I can think of that would make any kind of sense in light of the ruling would be the co’s would no longer be in business as is and shareholders are fairly compensated. No?