InvestorsHub Logo

Locksmith

09/12/19 12:25 AM

#6202 RE: Frank62 #6201

The trial start date has not been set, to my knowledge. The court granted Dror a continuance and (to my understanding) 9/20 is when charges need to be brought or dropped.

"...the parties have requested a continuance of defendant's time to indict beyond the 30 day limit set forth in the Speedy Trial Act of 1974..."

"The defendant's arrest preceded his indictment, and the facts upon which the grand jury must base its determination are unusual or complex."

"Therefore...the 30 day limit within which the defendant shall be indicated, as set forth in the Speedy Trial Act of 1974, has been extended until September 20, 2019"

IhidfromtheX

09/12/19 7:53 AM

#6203 RE: Frank62 #6201

A person may be found guilty of wire fraud even if he or she never actually defrauded anyone, and even if he or she did not personally send a fraudulent wire, radio, or television transmission. The state must prove that the defendant intended to defraud someone, or acted with knowledge that wire communications were being used to transmit fraudulent representations. It is also sufficient for the state to prove that the defendant caused the use of a wire transmission in order to commit or further the fraudulent scheme, even if the defendant did not intend the specific transmission, if it was reasonably foreseeable “in the ordinary course of business.” Pereira v. United States, 347 U.S. 1, 8 (1954).