Replies to post #55064 on Lans Holdings Inc (fka LAHO)

[elkonig]

Whats your point? The SEC suspended LAHO for delinquent filings and rightly so. The reason why is self explanatory which renders any other reasons about why the suspension now as moot.

[g0nz0]

Since we are setting the record straight I figure I would share my opinion. I mean from what DD I gathered LAHO has been behind since 2017. His other company MME* was also behind since 2017.

As you stated here:
It was suspended because unknown tipsters blew up SEC emails and phones telling them “look at their delinquent financials!”

Ok, well if THAT is true then answer this. According to the SEC document the SEC attempted to contact LANS back in MARCH of 2019.

On March 28, 2019, the Commission’s Division of Corporation Finance (“Corporation Finance”) sent a delinquency letter to LAHO requesting compliance with its periodic filing requirements, but LAHO did not receive the delinquency letter due to its failure to maintain a valid address on file with the Commission as required by Commission rules (Rule 301 of Regulation S-T, 17 C.F.R. Section 232.301 and Section 5.4 of EDGAR Filer Manual).

The RM LOI wasn't even announced until May!! So it looks like they were already trying to contact LANS long before the "tipsters" showed up and long before the "run" started.

So that blows that theory to pieces.

One business was located in Texas and the other in Florida. BOTH companies had a bogus addresses on file to where the SEC was unable to reach them. Yeah, nothing shady about that.

Sure, the SEC didn't shut them down for fraud but that doesn't mean there wasn't any fraud going on. I still believe this is all one giant scam and they knew they were going to get suspended so they didn't have to complete that bogus RM.

They put those PR's out, diluted BILLIONS of shares, made MILLIONS in revenue and let the SEC close up shop for them. Pretty clever!

I don't know about you but if I owned two business listed on the OTC I might keep my addresses current. But, If I was running a scam I would probably provide two fake addresses and get some fake employees listed on my Facebook and Linkedin Page. (By the way were listed YEARS before the RM LOI also... long before the "tipsters" showed up lol.

If you wish to believe they are genuine that is fine. I am not that gullible so I don't buy it for one second.

Regardless they screwed investors over BIG TIME. If they have kept their addresses up to date and didn't get 2 years delinquent maybe none of this would have happened. But they were too busy selling shares to focus on following the rules.

When you are running a SCAM that stuff isn't important. You notice they didn't have any problems when it came to putting out those PR's and they have no problems green lighting the dilution!

LANS HODING ARE THE ONLY ONES RESPONSIBLE FOR WHAT HAPPENED, DUE TO THEIR ACTIONS.

END OF STORY.