Yes, Sturgis, there are a plethora of other companies doing the same damn thing as Jason, and they have not been funded with toxic notes. Data443 is absolutely not "in". They are a guppy swimming upstream in the ocean of data security. TROW can twist it all he wants, but to get associated with slime OTC tickers like USMJ and IRNC and pumping out half-truth PR's makes this company look desperate. Email archiving has been around forever ( and there are a ton of providers ), and Jason acquired the cheapest one he could find. Digital currency? Data443 is simply a validator. No money there. Data classification? Ton of well established companies can provide that service. Hippa? Ton of well established companies can fill that need that are not funded by OTC shareholders and toxic notes. So, how exactly is Data443 in? You seem to know Jason's plan by insinuating that Data443 is being kept minimized on purpose, and that is a weak theory. A business does not keep itself minimized for any reason.....all public companies should be concerned about the bottom line and their shareholders. Your theory holds absolutely no weight at this point in time.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
AI
