InvestorsHub Logo

lorbas95

08/28/19 1:38 PM

#45432 RE: finesand #45431

Since Pestell told everyone in November he was in advanced negotiations about the test with third-parties (bullshit IMO) and the company always gave the impression that the prognostic test was fully developed, this might already be sufficient to justify RP's firing for cause: the need to hire a specialist wouldn't delay the development process by two years, obviously.

So while being CMO, it seems to me that it might be the case that RP was not transparent about the actual status of this test. It will indeed be interesting to watch the outcome of this.

If more work on the test is required, they should sell the damn thing immediately IMO.