Some of what you wrote in the previous message is true. Any person capable of reading a 10Q or the 10K can verify this. Some of what you wrote has not been proven. You are using logic but still their has been no proof presented to back your claims.
One of your claims is false. I will not inform you of your error. I will say it has a huge importance.
About the listing on the OTC or other major exchange; at the common share prices of the last 4 months this is impossible. If one or two interesting agreements that lead to revenues, the price will soar. It can occur.
Is De La Garza departure a lasting weight around our companies future? In my opinion if one sale occurs you will ask; who was this De La Garza character?
Do we need someone that understands shareholder relations and treats us as if we are not idiots. Yes darn right we do. Shareholders need the truth.
Do we need a true conference call and not a faked question and answer period? Again we do.
Should all known facts and evidence about not proven accusation about De La Garza be laid on the table? Absolutely. Lay it out. Clear the air.
No more dishonest estimates. We need the truth and no inaccurate claims.
1) Where is your proof there is no DataPath contract? 2) Where is your proof there is no Air Force contract? 3) Where is your proof there are no government contracts? 4) Exactly which material events did de la Garza fail to disclose? 5) Exactly where is the stock ledger off? 6) Exactly how has de la Garza been abusing the corporate accounts? 7) False. It was disclosed that Sullivan departed in a PR.
Your 'high' lights aren't even getting off the ground...
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
