Replies to post #75716 on Quantum Materials Corp. (fka QTMM)

[BigE1960]

I thought the conversation began with your assumption that OEMs have looked at QMC's product and ability to scale and passed on what they were presented.

1. #75666 is literally a response to #75661.
2. The OP's point is quoted in the first line!
3. "Ability to scale" was never mentioned nor ever part of the conversation.
4. The assumption is that those "who have actually evaluated the products" didn't see the superiority because they have not purchased materials from QMC. (A really safe assumption! What other reason would there be? QMC's price was too high?

to assume as though it must have happened was not factual

I am not even sure what this means, so let me ask, are you suggesting that QMC had the lowest cost, superior QD's and still OEM's opted not to buy them or that QMC had the lowest cost, superior QD's and kept them to themselves, never letting OEM's evaluate them?

I appreciate your effort at civility but considering all of the above, it's as though you never actually read the words. Read your #75682 again and you will see that it is a knee-jerk, defensive response and totally disconnected from the conversation. This new spin that it was presented as just "an indication of how difficult" it is to participate in the QD space is not be very believable. The additional shots at Dr. Edelman were an indication of how difficult the QD market was/is?