Replies to post #269082 on Innovation Pharmaceuticals Inc (IPIX)

[scottsmith]

Thank you for proving my point -- the initial payment is so small as to be immaterial to an investor deciding whether to purchase IPIX stock. Therefore, that is why Leo didn't have to disclose the amount and chose not to do so.

"Leo has determined the upfront money is nonmaterial after disclosing terms of the agreement."

[WILD_4_IPIX]

Hahahahaha....Thanks Lil K and .....

AND Attention IPIX BOARD ( REAL ) Investors.... The " others " GET an A+ for trying so so hard but let's face it ....their VOODOO just is NOT effective NO MO ! WE GOT A DEAL and IT's REAL !

SCOREBOARD !

DEAL - 1

Speculation and BS AFTER the DEAL - A BIG FAT - 0 !

It AIN'T WORKING anymore...for the chief or the group - NO MO !

An EXECUTED DEAL even if it ain't potential billions and just potential millions ALWAYS ALWAYS PROVIDES SH's CONFIDENCE and TRUMPS speculation from the naysayers that have nothing but a history of BS posts...FACTS SUCK SOMETIMES....especially if you picked the wrong side.

GOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO I P I X !

[loanranger]

"As LR pointed out, Leo has determined the upfront money is nonmaterial after disclosing terms of the agreement."

Did I? I don't think I attributed the decision to "Leo" and I would hope that the decision as to the materiality of the payment was made before the filing was made, not after it.

What amount of money would YOU think the Initial Payment would have to be for it to be material?

And I absolutely didn't say anything that sounded like Leo doesn't have to report cash not yet received, because that's patently false.