InvestorsHub Logo

Squirrel75

07/26/19 11:00 AM

#16902 RE: midtownmurphy #16901

Time will tell MM. The contradiction is overwhelming though in your statement. I was arrested 15 years ago for a crime, but was cleared at trial. Of course my attorney was a rather high ranking, and very known in the circle, of law enforcement. Evidence what you see on the surface is not always what it appears. SLB sounds like he will be cleared of charges. Send us pictures of the trial you take with your phone, so we know you were there and provide play by play coverage.

1972

07/26/19 12:23 PM

#16903 RE: midtownmurphy #16901

We live in the land of the free where you are presumed INNOCENT 'til proven guilty. How many times SLB has been arrested is irrelevant. How many times was he convicted is the only question to answer.
I recant the word "hearsay" and will use the term "second hand witnessed" in its place: as in they never witnessed any battery first hand nor were they on the receiving end of any battery. The state's witness just talked to/listened to person's who claimed they were battered by SLB. For the record, Steven Lawrence Brickner has never been convicted of any crime other than reckless driving (which was reduced from DUI). So to summarize ... the state's witnesses would only be able to talk about alleged crimes that SLB was never convicted for. However, Steven's defense attorney will "parade" four witnesses who witnessed first hand the "assault and battery" of SLB ..... My bad on the blatant misuse of the word hearsay. STSC LOOOOONG!!!! STSC STRONG!!!