“Any past predictions by individual investors are useless for people who want to make a buy-sell decision in this stock or any other stock.”
No. Saying: “Their next SEC filing will show a year-over-year improvement in the quarterly results. IMO.”
Based on: “Better terms for Pacific Ethanol's debt will produce an improved quarter. You should've read their March 27th press release and their July 15th press release.
You should also have read their Schedule 13-G, filed on the 18th, which documents a new 5% owner, under SEC Rule 13d-1b, which covers just over 4 million shares, and as predicted by the July 15th press release, an 8-K report, which includes this statement.”
Is put in perspective if you also read previous posts which where sure of a stock rally based on previous PR’s and other information.
Combine that with someone telling in advance that these predictions where off, based on years of investing in PEIX and a long term experience in their PR’s and a good track record in predicting this stocks direction, and it isn’t as useless as you think.
But hey, we’re going to have the same chatter after the results again about PEIX heading for a RS, and you saying they must go up because of their price to book ratio. Finally it ends with a RS.
At least the price moves huh?
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
