InvestorsHub Logo

fuagf

07/24/19 9:09 PM

#319713 RE: blackhawks #319709

We gotta agree to disagree occasionally, i guess. This looks to be one one of them. I thought Dan Rather's ..

Dan Rather
45 mins ·
The morning session is over, and here are my thoughts:
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=150111466

was on the mark. And again, i missed the Intel C session.

DesertDrifter

07/24/19 9:19 PM

#319714 RE: blackhawks #319709

For sure. There was something that just seemed a little "off" today. He seemed to be confused.. it took him a long time to figure out who was talking to him, aides sometimes pointing them out. I have never seen any other congressional hearing where subjects have that problem repeatedly. I almost felt sorry for him sometimes when he kind of stammered and "you knowed" through anything more complex than a "yup" or "nope" which seemed to be the order of the day.

When you do participatory group construction of a document, you get pretty familiar with each inclusion, as nothing goes unchallenged or undiscussed. So some of the behaviors today were kind of opaque to me.