Replies to post #90130 on Creative Medical Technology Holdings Inc (CELZ)

[7PJYPa8ffn]

That's very true and it is crazy that NIH allows lack of reporting to occur. Sponsors have 12 months to report but vast majority do not meet the deadline. That said if CMTH has good data I believe they would have reported it by now. It is inexplicable to keep it from the public especially when you are trying to recruit patients to undergo an invasive medical procedure without providing them the safety and efficacy results from their own completed trial. Thats why I sold for a loss. Too much time elapsed and it does not make any sense that if this is an effective treatment they would not want to make the results public. I have done research at an academic center. We reported results within weeks of completing studies. It can take 6 months or longer to publish results but based on their last press release they have not even submitted a manuscript yet to a peer reviewed journal which is also hard to make sense of. Either UCLA or CMTH should have reported the results by now in my opinion. I hope this company proves me wrong and things reverse but I could no longer justify keeping a position in this company