You are wrong about that. No one bases investment decisions on ASSumptions. There are ENORMOUS AMOUNTS of FACTUAL and verified public information on ARYC and its technology.
Everyone wants financials - that's a given. Can we not make some educated guesses based on what we do know about certain publicly verifiable contracts with the federal government for example? It's all about Risk/Reward - some people want more proof (i.e. audited financials) before they invest whereas others may take position based on the partial picture we do have (please don't misunderstand me....the financials are a very big gap).
Would you or others with a similar viewpoint concede that even if a fraction of the Tweeted billing numbers are factual that we would be back at .20 and likely much higher if/when financials prove that out?
That being said, can I assume that Arrayit made some money (or at least generated revenue) off my purchase of this Bloodcard?
Can I also assume that Arrayit got paid something for being the lab that processed my Pinnertest (questions on IgG vs. IgE aside)
Same goes for James and his Allergy Test. I assume Arrayit will make something wouldn't you agree?
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
AI
