InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

zj3001

07/14/19 8:39 AM

#161383 RE: TRUISM #161378

The rs is not the issue for a producing company. When you take a non income producing company, slower moving and frugal ceo....

Issue 1: rs will effect you loyal shareholders, not Kim.

Issue 2: when you move to a big board, majority will not pay $15/Share (or whatever the reserve split comes out to) in current phase. It will continue to drop slow or fast until huge forward momentum progress is released. It’s has nothing to do with fundamentals, it’s a psychological. People are willing to fork up a money on cheaper priced stocks in order to get future mega gains on tons of shares they bought cheap. Higher ROI. But now you tell me I can buy a few shares at $15, I don’t see as much of an up side.

Going from $0.30 to $2 is awesome ROI and easy for me to see as real.

Going from $15-100, still good, but same ROI. The higher you go, people to research the heck out of a stock to see it’s legit and will look for rev. Yes, there are lots of money on big board not making money (BIO) but that is the “cool” kids popularity contest, and has peoples attention.

Verses the stage we are now, people will think the company is worth a shot and dump money....you have already seen this the last 3 months.

Just saying, not everything in market in fundamentally correct. It’s a big popularity contest and psychological warfare.

Personally hope it doesn’t go through. Get revenue, and buy back shares. Or have Kim be RS like the rest. Or even retire shares... the whole float isn’t being used.
icon url

PaddyOBrien

07/14/19 9:47 AM

#161402 RE: TRUISM #161378

“How many reputable financial institutions deal with penny stocks in general? ”

Are you insinuating that it would be hard for Kim to find a reputable accounting firm with integrity that would take his business?
icon url

igotthemojo

07/14/19 11:49 AM

#161429 RE: TRUISM #161378

"How many reputable financial institutions deal with penny stocks in general?"

all of them if you are the real deal...none of them if you are not...the idea that kim cant find a reputable financial institution to do business with without first artificially raising the share price makes no sense..

"Additionally, how many potential BOD's would be proud to be associated with an OTC stock?"

who cares?..they come and they go...find the best you can, appoint them, then replace them as needed...

"Reduce shares....Add at a higher price, to assist in satisfying financial agreements/obligations...What's the problem?"

oh nothing much...just a loss of 50% or more of the stock value...no biggie..


icon url

Janous

07/14/19 3:24 PM

#161497 RE: TRUISM #161378

I just invested in a stock that has directors from 4 major, well known, highly successful, international companies. It is an OTC.