Does saying erhe only fell from .985 to almost zero somehow ease the pain? It's still a loss of more than 99% even if it isn't accurate.
I don't believe I ever said it traded at $98.90, simply that the price chart shows a fall from $98.90 to current level near zero. Price is always adjusted for splits, both forward and reverse. It's the only way to accurately look at historical pricing data. Anyone who owned shares in 2006 and didn't sell because they chose to gamble on commercial finds can easily attest to how far their investment has fallen.
Pretending the reverse split didn't happen and it didn't lead to the more than 99% losses erhe shareolders incurred might work for a small circle of investors, but pretending can't change the facts.
Once again see chart below or any historical chart. It's not fake.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
