Replies to post #540395 on Fannie Mae-No Politics (FNMA)

[Doc.007]

That's a Good Find and shows the complexity of so many Fakes and Lies to keep then everything nicely synchronized, because to remember systematically every kind of Fooling is nearly impossible !

I would have one more Lawsuit opportunity of " Faked Investments to Off-Set the National Depth and To Fool Taxpayer ! ".

I think that many Lawsuits made the strategic mistake for Not First Take On The Preconditional Topics for after succeed To Take On such Topics as Dividends, Etc. where the Money For The Shareholders Is.

Happy Weekend

[Here I am]

I already denounced it in Twitter. The SPSPA is null and void because of that. Notice that it says that they agree to not seek termination of the Conservatorship, pursuant to the FHEFSSA SEC1367, because that section includes the Conservator's Power: "Put FnF in a sound and solvent condition", which means recapitalization and paying off the obligations SPS with the Treasury.
Today I will write more about it, because it's the moment when they agreed on The Secret Plan.

[YanksGhost]

This is precisely why I keep posting that the NWS can ONLY be supported by the Collins en banc ruling if FHFA is required to declare receivership under Willett's dissent to the Appeal ruling. And the reason I cite to advance this outcome as likely? Because no en banc would have opted to reconsider a lengthy trial and appeal if the majority ruling was not viewed as seriously flawed.

[schnabel]

Maybe they feel this falls under the defense that has got them this far, which is: FHFA is able to do whatever is deemed by them to be in the best interest of the GSE's. So far this defense has successfully cast a very large blanket over many of their shenanigans.

[camaro4me]

Best post ever.

"The house of cards is falling"

[kthomp19]

you will find something interesting that continues to not yet be specifically litigated.

Not only has this not been litigated, it hasn't even been part of any of the complaints that I am aware of.

No one has litigated this, yet.

Why do you think that is? With all the trouble that the plaintiffis have gone through to try and strike down the NWS, why haven't they gone after this seemingly low-hanging fruit?

The only logical answer is that this isn't the smoking gun you (or anyone else) thinks it is. There have been many legal theories thrown around on message boards, but none of them ever get acted on! If this is such a damning piece of evidence, why have you not filed a lawsuit over it?