InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

Vandalayind

07/12/19 3:12 PM

#52104 RE: I-Glow #52103

Most recent 10K = ADVERSE OPINION.

Even the auditors disagree.
icon url

Dank02

07/12/19 3:13 PM

#52105 RE: I-Glow #52103

Junk seriously? Because they are on store shelves everywhere, this is junk? Hmmm I wonder who makes the great stuff and it baffles me why no one is stocking it. Because all I see is plus cbd on store shelves everywhere.
I think your intentions are quite clear and 99 percent of readers can read your messages clearly
icon url

Hmmmmmm

07/12/19 3:15 PM

#52106 RE: I-Glow #52103

Why isn't 60 million possible? over 14million past 2 quarters each, extrapolated over a year with minimal growth is 60 million. They'll do a hell of a lot more than 60 million in 2019.
icon url

CashMoneyCarl

07/12/19 3:23 PM

#52107 RE: I-Glow #52103

We all know that Mona is still calling the shots and can't be trusted in providing accurate financial information.



And you have proof of this?

Speculation, just like everything else that you post. Where are the links to back up anything that you have to say?

If Mona is a crook like you keep implying, then so is Andrew Left. He too was convicted of fraud. If it looks and smells like a skunk, its a skunk.

You remind me of Donald Trump. If he hears something that he doesn't like he calls it fake news. Thats exactly what you are doing here. You dont like the idea of CVSI pulling in 60 Million in revenues so you simply say its not possible .. without offering any proof why.
icon url

foti1kenobi

07/12/19 3:23 PM

#52108 RE: I-Glow #52103

"CVSI claims to be on target for over $60 million in revenue - which isn't possible"

yawn
Why do you think all big MJ companies are trying to get into CBD

Not only is it possible, they're going to eclipse that number in time.... Deal with it