InvestorsHub Logo

Kurt_Banoffee

07/05/19 2:29 PM

#75064 RE: Jamis1 #75063

I didn't mean to imply they were still working together, but they very well could be.



True, and it very well could be that they never "worked with" Kateeva in the first place in any meaningful sense of the phrase. You can't get there without reading between the lines.

Kurt_Banoffee

07/05/19 2:49 PM

#75066 RE: Jamis1 #75063

I have no idea why they would buy the QDs from QMC. If you're suggesting it's for some reason that precluded the other companies, couldn't that logic be flipped on its head to argue that all the QDs sold by other companies over the years were because QMC couldn't deliver on the requirements? Often, a sale is just a sale.

I didn't know that Kateeva purchased anything from QMC, and I was pleased when I saw your post. It was the next post. As I read it, I was like "good grief, here we go again. Why does a sale have to be more than a sale." As I've pointed out over and over, if this stock is what it's purported to be why is there a seemingly obsessive-compulsive need make assumptions and spin news into more than what was stated? Why isn't simply selling to Kateeva good enough when that all you know to be true?

I agree that just because QMC hasn't come out to say were working with Kateeva, doesn't me they aren't. It also doesn't mean they ever did anything besides sell them some scrap QDs they had lying around.