Yes, there is a big difference but maybe doesnt know that tweeting is not a PR. Tweeting is not PR and whoever think otherwise is wrong. besides, i was also referring to two completely different companies. INND CEO who likes to tweet and UCPA CEO who don't dont tweet at all and not even PR but he merged my posts for whatever hist motive. Maybe he doesn't like my posts of pointing out the flaws of Matthew.
The difference between a PR and a tweet was acknowledged and discussed in a post that was subsequently removed. The fact that different stocks were discussed was also acknowledged in the same removed post.
A PR and a tweet do however both communicate with stock holders.
On one stock with no communication a stock holder gets mad due to no communication other than quarterlies.
On another stock WITH communication a stock holder gets mad because of the communications and wants to WAIT for quarterlies.
Stock holders cannot have it both ways. Either stock holders want communication, or they do not want communication. Being mad in both cases is not consistent.
Day to day and even week to week inconsistency on what stock holders want is not helpful.
Changing ones mind about a stock over time for real world reasons makes perfect sense. Changing ones mind quickly and for inconsistent reasons makes no sense at all.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
AI
