Replies to post #538440 on Fannie Mae-No Politics (FNMA)

[bcde]

"That the En banc decision has been conveyed to the respective litigants but intentionally not posted on the website due to the sensitivity of the case and the myriad of tangled mess ups it may cause? I am not able to see why it has not been posted even though it's 160+ days "

Nobody knows how these judges work or do not work. Judges are totally unaccountable to anyone and beat OB hands down in keeping everything secret from public but not from cronies. Traders knew before hand the ruling of Judge Lamberth and started selling the stock few days before ruling.

DC circuit judges took 1.5 years to come up with cooked up majority Perry ruling. May be, Judge Brown had to work hard to come up with excellent minority dissenting opinion. But other two judges simply wasted their time having already made the decision to rule against Perry. Probably because of Judge Brown, other two Judges gave part favorable ruling to Perry.

Everything in DC is swampy. Let us hope 5th circuit is better than swampy DC circuit.

[Ace Trader]

I've been watching Level 2 like a hawk for over 2 weeks and it's being held tight not letting it drop and not getting to far above but keeping it around the 5 day moving average while they wait for eiather Gov plan or En Banc. Also the CCI line has gone side ways so no real selling or buying.

If ther was such insder info you would see hudge amounts of buying or selling on the quiet but there has been very low volume.

[YanksGhost]

<< withholding en banc court ruling? >>

It would not be unusual for a court to notify attorney's of record of an expected date and time for a ruling's release by that court.

It would be unusual for a court to release the results of that ruling to attorney's and fail to docket that simultaneously since most every court has gone digitized. An exception to this would be in some cases where a verdict is announced one day and the supporting detail memorandum is released shortly thereafter. There have been one or two examples of this in F/F cases already; I seem to recall Edwards v. PwC was one such example. But the delay in providing the full ruling was only like 24 hors or so.

However, I suspect your real question is if some controversial ruling has been released to litigants and defendants and is being withheld for some sensitivity reason. The answer on this would be absolutely not. The court will redact its filings, if necessary, but will never conceal its rulings.

JMO.