InvestorsHub Logo

Wooden Indian

07/02/19 1:22 PM

#8981 RE: eik #8980

This is why I am here and adding to my stash eom

Implanting

07/02/19 2:51 PM

#8982 RE: eik #8980

Very informative article, thanks for posting it Eik.

What I found very interesting was the part about the prior property owner at Goldlund having an open pit mine that they were apparently mining in the past.

That makes me wonder why we couldn't resume mining on that site? I would think getting the permitting reinstated shouldn't be a big deal. Why wouldn't that be something Management would be interested in with a gold price a few hundred bucks higher from here? That should be profitable.

Implanting

07/03/19 9:24 AM

#8990 RE: eik #8980

Eik, FYI I sent the Ontario press release you posted yesterday on the Company out to Mal in IR. She told me she hadn't seen the article either, so maybe now the Company is in the loop thanks to You.

The main reason I sent her the article was to question her regarding Tamaka's prior open pit mining operation there and how feasible it might be to restart it. My thinking was that we need to get some revenue going and if there was a possibility that this property could be mined in a reasonable about of time it could come into production before anything else they own. I.E. Springpole.

I'm not sure how much Mal knows about what I asked her, but she basically came back to me referencing their last PR on Goldlund. IMO the Ontario press release was originated from this Company PR.

https://firstmininggold.com/news/releases/first-mining-announces-start-of-2019-drill-program-at-the-goldlund-gold-project

I'm thinking someone at First Mining had to have already thought of where I was going with my question and have determined to look for better areas to mine at Goldlund. That's why they're now focusing the drilling program at Miller. If I'm reading the Ontario article correctly Miller is the property 10 kilometers northeast of the main deposit, which I assume is where Tamaka had their pit.