InvestorsHub Logo

BigBake1

06/26/19 8:53 AM

#145519 RE: bigballer_sa4 #145518

No it was accurate is it was based on the date in which all these shares were cancelled. So misleading is claiming otherwise, company provided information, so the company was misleading.

Tgarfield2

06/27/19 9:07 AM

#145635 RE: bigballer_sa4 #145518

There is at least 20 disclosures showing the OS less than 14. It pretty much proves you've never read the company disclosures. One year ago it was 14. Go back farther and it was under a billion so it's going up.

Here is one.

That conversion that dropped the OS to 13.6 billion was part of a doubling of the affiliates piece of the pie. They converted debt at 0.00005 and then back at twice the rate of 0.0001 to preferreds. Then the company claimed that there was no more notes or long term debt. That of course was taken by newbie to mean no more debt which was not true since there was still about 20 million that was not reported in any disclosures.

It's misleading to claim that there was any reduction. Only on a piece of paper was there. In reality the average common shareholder got a smaller piece of pie. The company won't explain this to you and neither will the transfer agent.