Please re-read the Statement that the Plan Administrator made to the Court that Cotton posted... It has a subtle difference. He was not referring the the CT Prospectus guarantees that we all know. Rather he seemed to be implying that somehow we relied (and knew) that the CTs had Parity with ECAPS "when the Plan was already put in motion" and that we were "Aware of the fact that the ECAPS were not expected to make any monies" but STILL Bought our CTs... So, he made this statement to the Court yesterday...Again Deliberately omitting the FACT that the ECAPS boards/trsut subsidiaries were shut-down PRIOR to the date that the POR wnet into execution/operation... Perhaps, at this stage, based on Cotton's & Mr.Wus' submissions, the Court is aware of this 'Concealment' & 'hood-winking' of the Court... BUt I think the judge cannot really force the Plan Administrator to Pay the CTs now unless we go with a Strong lawyer team and File another MOtion to fight the CTs cause and are prepared to APPEAL any adverse Ruling from the BK Court.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
AI
