In my defense, I did not assume you were the other poster, please read it again.
I am just having a hard time trying to understand what you are trying to convey, what your point of view is, or what your idea might be.
My bad today, I bit and opened a link you posted; the link's intention seemed to dis the CVSI PR today about research results. With a cyptic comment "Not saying jmho", I assumed your take was that you fully expected the results to be challenged, or agreed with the article. What kind of a reaction did you expect other than one to question?
Then you post a reply educating me on what "Not saying" means. Try adding "JMHO" to that and placing it in front of a post which was clearly intended to minimize the CVSI PR today. How is one supposed to *read* you mind and interpret what you say.
Just being transparent, I will revert to ignoring all links without comment; if the comment is not pertinent to the link, I will call you on it.
Have a great rest of the day.
SL
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
AI
