InvestorsHub Logo

Edward

06/14/19 5:46 AM

#50094 RE: Loyalhound #50093


And as for the name, whether its name ends in Technologies or Biologicals is moot.



There was a reason to note that this is GreenGro Technologies not GreenGro Biologicals. Previous postings posted incorrect links to GreenGro Biologicals, a diffrent company!! Having the correct links and information to GreenGro Technologies is important!The company has made numerous claims that have not materialized, and a bottom line of $2million will not happen in the first year of operation.Yes, we do not know what the sales will be, however we also do not know what the cost of acquiring or leasing the land was. Also, since GreenGro has no past experience in seed growing, how in the world would they know what the bottom line will be.Clearly the investment community is not buying what GreenGro says.

deanna-hopkins

06/20/19 10:04 AM

#50099 RE: Loyalhound #50093

GRNH needs to do what Hecla Mining (HL) does, that’s issue a monthly or at least a quarterly cash distribution, be it $0.0001 per share per month or something, but if GRNH did that. LIke Hecla Mining does, they will seperate themselves from the pack of over 1,000 MJ stocks all claiming to have the one stalk that leads the average Jack to the Jolly Green Giant’s Golden Goose. THat’s why IIPR is soaring, because they treat their shareholders like owners of a company that get a paycheck, be it 2% or something on PAR with a Chase or Wells Fargo 11 month CD rate. Shucks USAA’s cash money market fund is a 2.4% monthly distribution. If GreenGro just gave out a microcent each month in cash, the PPS would soar.