It didn’t matter that you were constantly wrong on the filings before, because German and King were always there to help you along. Nothing’s changed. Oh wait...
lets take a look at the warrants with arj in this matter from what i read after conversion the warrants would have giving them 925,925,925 shares but instead they amended it to were they only got 500,000,000 shares for the same money . that is 425,925,925 shares less then the original amount of the warrant after conversion. now this was at a fixed exercise price of $.0025 per share. what is wrong with that?
now yes he purchased them at .0025 and is making a profit there is nothing wrong with that. now you purchased shares at .0025 and now they are up and you are making money on your investment. So why would it not be fare for him to make the same money on his investment but at a higher stack in the game. he is taking the same risk as we are if they share price falls so dose his profit margin just as yours dose .I think that is fare dont you? well we all invest to make money dont we ? So with that said he invested to make money as well but at higher stacks then we do so he will make more then us and it just draws more attention to what he owns then what the average investor owns all is far in love and war. Also for the rest of the shares he owns he bought them out of his own pocket just as you and i did. so i think it is fare and nothing wrong with that. Gains in your account also mean gains in his account it is only fare.
Andrew Garnock's beneficial ownership is not below 10%. It is 24.2%, so he has to file his sells and buys. And the only things that have occurred after the initial agreement is an ammendment with better conditions for the company and an additional buy (not sale) of shares by Andrew Garnock for $500,000, priced above the market for the day of the agreement (0.012).
If we look at Today's Price, even though we know that Andrew Garnock invested his money on February and the increase in price we have been seeing is mainly because of his involvement with the company (anyone here can easily check the chart and see when price started to jump and had a total change: February 2019 with Andrew Garnock´s involvement. Casualty? I don't think so), not only Andrew Garnock has huge gains, but all of the real, loyal and transparent shareholders that have not been buying and selling. A lot of shareholders have gains at percentages higher than Andrew Garnock's.
Now if we compare the new agreement to the first agreement, Andrew Garnock is actually paying 85% premium ( 0.0025 / 0.00135 - 1 ) for the note and warrant and 789% premium ( 0.012 / 0.00135-1 ) for the May 30th SPA and is receiving 500,000,000 shares for the note and 500,000,000 for the warrant vs. the 925,925,025 for the note and the the 925,925,925 for the warrant of the first agreement for the same $2,500,000. Additionally, he is investing $500,000 more for just 41,666,666 shares. So not a discount, but a premium. Half of the expected shares for more money. I and true longs like that new deal for the company
Other thing, the insider you are refering to is not the COO, is the CFO and he is receiving a bonus for results as in any company looking for profit. Also his salary is much less than the market, so he is clearly expecting to make money from the shares and he knows what is coming.
Revenue for this year will be in the $100M range and not what you say, additionally the companies are also valued according to their potential and growth, that in our case have been above 100% for the last Quarters. So guess what revenue and market cap we will see soon with the compound effect of this increases, the M&As and new contracts. Market cap is clearly undervalued and is headed for a correction to the upside.