Replies to post #80752 on Voip Pal Com Inc (VPLM)

[nyt]

And.....

Oh, and by the way, that "pop" to 45 wasn't exactly a pop nor was it fully due to the ptab ruling. It took a full month to get there and was also due to many paid & unpaid pumps, here, there and everywhere. I said immediately and even before, that such a ruling was nice but not a actual win of anything and would not prove to be that important. That played out to be the truth as 1) a ptab loss for the initiators is not a "win" for vplm because they didn't gain anything that they didn't already have all along & 2) because it did not cause any revenue to occur or sales, licenses or settlements. All it did was help to provide some of the pps boost for a time, the last time there was any real day trading opportunity. Of course that is now completely gone, as the 17 month, major, 95% longterm downtrend (I know, I know, it's really an uptrend, lol) has dropped back to below where it was when it started.

[nyt]

And.....

Oh, and by the way, that "pop" to 45 wasn't exactly a pop nor was it fully due to the ptab ruling. It took a full month to get there and was also due to many paid & unpaid pumps, here, there and everywhere. I said immediately and even before, that such a ruling was nice but not a actual win of anything and would not prove to be that important. That played out to be the truth as 1) a ptab loss for the initiators is not a "win" for vplm because they didn't gain anything that they didn't already have all along & 2) because it did not cause any revenue to occur or sales, licenses or settlements. All it did was help to provide some of the pps boost for a time, the last time there was any real day trading opportunity. Of course that is now completely gone, as the 17 month, major, 95% longterm downtrend (I know, I know, it's really an uptrend, lol) has dropped back to below where it was when it started.