InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

RFB

05/29/19 1:35 PM

#66530 RE: maxinkuckee #66529

Problem is, there are a ton of proven suppliers....as these parts are being made on a daily basis, RIGHT NOW, with proven techniques that are validated. Is SGLBs product a better wheel/process, maybe, but it is and continues to be UNPROVEN. Until it is accepted and validated by a sale, they are like so many other businesses out there....a great idea.
icon url

outlook2020

05/29/19 2:46 PM

#66533 RE: maxinkuckee #66529

I don’t disagree. However, if the idea is to have a QA process for a metal printer which produces a cost saving of 40% or more (JR’s number) because of printing the part (instead of casting) and they can use an existing method to QA the part. The companies will not allow SGLB to cut too far into their 40% saving or more just to have the PrintRite3D software. That is a real cost consideration.