InvestorsHub Logo

chemist72

05/26/19 11:49 AM

#8101 RE: Tim Eriksen #8100

Thanks for your analysis. My approach is more simple-minded, which is why my original post was talking about cash on hand. Can't make it much more simple than that.

You know what they say, "Keep it simple, silly". -LOL

My simple method relies on a steady or slightly increasing rate of cash added each quarter. This has been true for the last 3 quarters as follows:

Q2 2018 to Q3 2018 - cash increased by $2.7M.
Q3 2018 to Q4 2018 - cash increased by $2.6M.
Q4 2018 to Q1 2019 - cash increased by $3.6M.
(all of the above figures are based on rounded off numbers for unrestricted cash on hand)

If others don't like this method or call it "wrong", that's their prerogative. I will continue to use this model for myself, but will not post it on the board unless someone might request my valuation for PIOE.

Tim Eriksen

05/26/19 4:54 PM

#8105 RE: Tim Eriksen #8100

Another factor in valuation

The upside in P10 is huge.

If ebitda can be increased by $1 million annually and it is valued at 10x that adds $10 million to enterprise value. Since debt does not change that means the increase is attributable to the equity. $10 million of value is $0.11 per share.

The other cool thing is time. Let's assume in the June quarter they have $7 million of ebitda and $5 million of free cash flow. The $5 million is attributable solely to the equity, which is $0.05 to $0.06 per share every quarter.

So we have a $1.40 stock that even if everything stays the same, the share price should theoretically increase $0.20 to $0.25 per share in twelve months.

Putting the two together. It is not unrealistic to think ebitda ends the year at $30 million run rate, which means $0.20 to $0.22 per share increase in valuation, plus the three quarters of earnings ($0.15 to $0.18) means a total of $0.35 to $0.40 per share in possible gain.