InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

DragonBear

05/16/19 11:39 AM

#31988 RE: microcaps1 #31982

Are u saying the hub-no ZN

In your previous post you made out the signed up Emailing had information not previously disclosed in a filing. Emailing unknown material to a select group of SHs would be a FD violation. No way to spin that fact. If you now want to claim the Emailing was Brown blabbering a pile of BS previous known, then it's unclear why the thrill in bringing it up. As it was previously known, and does not constitute news. Can't have it both ways.

A company under an informal non public inquiry which is not charged with any wrongdoing does not lose its protections under the FD act.



That's a nonsensical statement in three aspects. First ZN is under a FORMAL SEC Investigation. If it were informal, the SEC would not have subpoena powers.

Any time a SH believes the SEC investigation has shown no "wrong doing", then they should demand management immediately file an 8K stating a termination letter has been received from the SEC. Else the FORMAL investigation remains open, and no conclusions can be made whether or not the SEC will litigate.

There are no protections for violating FD.