InvestorsHub Logo

Faltotyq

05/10/19 2:32 PM

#2407 RE: Aquahoya #2405

It appears their post was deleted. But looks may have scared someone into selling. And relisting for a flip at .95 obviously.
Failed business attempts from 20+ years ago seem irrelevant here now.
If $SIGN sticks to it and gets current, then I will know my investment here is really strong.

RealisticResearch

05/12/19 4:41 PM

#2417 RE: Aquahoya #2405

Saying that the technology would work is great and all, but requiring FIU to fund that R&D while Signet sits back and holds the patent isn't worthy enough of investing in a pipe dream.

Everything points to FIU needing to spend upwards of two million dollars in R&D to develop the patent which would then give me and anyone else interested in making money on this a good reason to invest.

HOWEVER, Signet does NOT intent to invest a dime into R&D. All of the money you people invest in Signet simply goes to paying Ernie a salary.. that's it. Every single one of his holdings has turned to shit. So, let me get this straight, you're paying a dollar a share (.95 cents right now) to hold a company that has no interest in developing the technology or assisting FIU to gather the necessary funds?

Like the 3-d camera techology, the graphene technology, and every other tech this company has promoted has done only one thing -- a transfer of wealth to mr. letiziano. And with 100 million shares of stock available thats a sizable dilution with no discernible revenue stream.

There are hundreds of other penny stocks out there with better financials.