InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

JERSEYHAWG

05/08/19 3:23 PM

#83966 RE: Banjo50 #83965

That has been the past practice, for all these years.

My gawd, when does it stop?

I cant figure any of this out. Its to complicated.
icon url

stockmojo9

05/08/19 3:32 PM

#83967 RE: Banjo50 #83965

The CT prospectus allows re-allocating payments to higher classes under certain bankruptcy proceedings for 5-years or 20-quarters.

It has been 40-quarters, twice as long as permitted under the prospectus.

Why should we feel the past practice of redirecting CT payments is appropriate when the CT prospectus clearly states limitations to the practice?

Why isn't that considered fraud and looting the Estate?

It is the same for the rest of the subordinated issues.

Good luck.

mojo
icon url

SwissCheeseAccount

05/08/19 6:55 PM

#83970 RE: Banjo50 #83965

Banjo i asked you if you wanted the detailed answer and you told nella you will not purchase. Once again, would you like the detailed answers to your questions? the loopy loops and the plot twist?