Replies to post #82222 on Creative Medical Technology Holdings Inc (CELZ)

[monte379]

So a noted result of patients in 2019 is a blatant lie because the original trial patients in 2017 are not published yet? Okie Dokie

[monte379]

Ohhh. And yes, I am montetheLUCKY. Added a nice amount of 7’s. :)

[monte379]

Re reading your post, I like the source article better myself. Some poor soul was so bad off he needed a double dose and a prp graph and now with truly exceptional results in terms of activity recovery that show a truly rosy future for the non-invasive and non-surgical treatment of erectile dysfunction

Seems like a big WIN for CaverStem where NOTHING worked previously. I agree, they should have left that in. Keep those 70% numbers moving up.

No matter which way you slice it, exceptional results have been seen. Go $CELZ